Rubric 3: Analytic Grading-How to improve your skill level
bad | requirements enhancement | Good | Excellent | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Thesis | No argument that is overarching be discerned. | Is confusing, underdeveloped or contradictory. Will not fit well because of the range associated with the project. Importance is uncertain. | Exists and it is comprehensible, if underdeveloped in places. Might be extremely unoriginal or broad. Importance is talked about. | Is initial, imaginative, insightful and provocative. Is suitable to your project’s scale. Importance is obviously explained. |
proof | Either no evidence is supplied, or there are many mistakes that are factual omissions or oversimplifications. Author greatly overstates importance of proof. | Depends on few sources. Not sufficient proof is supplied to aid writer’s argument, or proof is incomplete, incorrect or oversimplified. Restrictions of proof aren’t well comprehended. | Several different forms of sources can be used to guide arguments. Provides necessary evidence to persuade audience of all facets of the main argument. Need for proof often assumed. | A broad array of sources is found in imaginative how to help arguments. Efficiently integrates wider knowledge to spell out evidence. Pupil shows the limits of various forms of proof. |
Organization | Essay doesn’t have clear organizational pattern. | Exists in the phrase degree. Paragraphs lack clear direction, additionally the logic regarding the paper all together is obscure. Read more |